設(shè)定會談內(nèi)容和范圍
VIA REGULAR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
May 18, 2004
Mr. Johnson Smith
Providence Group, Inc.
620 - 5th Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10002
The United States of America
Dear Mr. Smith:
Please allow this to confirm our telephone conversation early today.
First, thank you for agreeing to meet with me on May 25, 2004 at 2:00 p.m. sharp in
your office. I appreciate your squeezing time out of your busy schedule to discuss
the services that we are providing to you. The following is a list of the questions
that we could cover. However, they are only intended as suggestions, and the
conversation may cover whatever you wish to discuss. These suggested questions
are:
- What is your overall satisfaction with Zhang, Wang & Lee, L.L.P.?
- Are you pleased with the legal services provided to you?
- Specifically, how are we doing in the following areas:
- Avoiding surprises?
- Meeting deadlines?
- Billing process?
- Communicating often?
- Work product?
- Would you recommend our firm to others and, if so, why?
Second, your concern about proving your case in the People’s Court is misconceived.
Similar to corresponding concepts in American common law, burden of proof as used
by Chinese courts actually describes two different components: first, the “burden of
persuasion,” which never shifts from one party to the other at any stage of the
proceeding, and second, the “burden of going forward with the evidence,” which
may shift back and forth between the parties as the trial progresses. Except as
otherwise provided by law, the burden of proof in a civil case tried by the People’s
Court requires proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
If you have any questions prior to our meeting, please do not hesitate to call me at
1234-5678.Sincerely,
Zhang, Wang & Lee, L.L.P.
Deguang Zhang, Managing Partner
(聲明：本站所使用圖片及文章如無注明本站原創(chuàng)均為網(wǎng)上轉(zhuǎn)載而來，本站刊載內(nèi)容以共享和研究為目的，如對刊載內(nèi)容有異議，請聯(lián)系本站站長。本站文章標有原創(chuàng)文章字樣或者署名本站律師姓名者，轉(zhuǎn)載時請務(wù)必注明出處和作者，否則將追究其法律責任。) |
